In Hobart, many people are exploring non-surgical treatments to maintain facial structure, lift sagging skin, or restore softness lost with time. Two approaches often discussed are facial contouring and PDO threads. While both offer subtle, tailored ways to support ageing skin, they do so in very different ways and choosing between them depends on what your face actually needs.
Here’s how they work, what sets them apart, and why one may suit you more than the other.

Quick Answers About Facial Contouring and PDO Threads
What’s the difference between facial contouring and PDO threads?
Facial contouring is used to support volume with soft gel-based treatments that plump and shape specific areas. PDO threads can help lift sagging skin without adding volume by repositioning tissues for a more supported appearance.
How long does it take to see results from each treatment?
Facial contouring changes are usually visible shortly after treatment, although mild swelling can temporarily alter the appearance. PDO threads may provide some early lift, with many people noticing further changes over 6 to 12 weeks as collagen develops, but timing varies between individuals.
Which option is better for sagging around the jawline?
PDO threads are often chosen to address sagging skin, especially in areas such as the jowls or lower face, when lift is a priority. Facial contouring can still support lost structure in these regions, but on its own does not usually create lift.

Facial Contouring vs PDO Threads: What’s the Difference?
In cosmetic therapy, structure and lift are often grouped, but they do not always come from the same treatment. Facial contouring and PDO threads share similar goals, yet their support for your features is fundamentally different.
Contouring treatments are used to support volume. When facial structure begins to soften or hollow, carefully placed contouring can help bring back shape and balance for some people. Many treatments used across Hobart today use a soft gel-like substance similar to sugars that occur naturally in the skin. It attracts water, softens transitions and supports definition where it has been lost. Common areas include the cheeks, chin, lips and under-eye region.
PDO threads, on the other hand, focus on repositioning the skin rather than adding volume. Instead, they are used to gently lift areas of sagging skin by placing fine, dissolvable threads just beneath the surface. These threads act like a temporary scaffold, helping to support the skin in a more lifted position. Over time, the threads dissolve, and the body’s response can include new collagen and elastin around them, which may help the treated area feel firmer and more supported for some people.

When Volume Works and When Lift Matters
Choosing between the two comes down to what your skin needs.
If you are experiencing hollowing in the cheeks or under the eyes, or notice deepening folds around the nose and mouth, a volume-based treatment may be more suitable. This approach aims to restore some of the softness and support that naturally reduce over time.
If your main concern is sagging, especially around the jawline, jowls or neck, threads may offer a more direct option. They do not inflate the tissue but instead help to lift it, which can counter the downward pull of gravity and changes in skin tension for some people.
For some, a combination of both treatments may be considered. Volume can support structure, while threads assist with repositioning. A full-face assessment helps determine where each might be used and in what order.
What to Expect From Treatment and Recovery
Facial contouring appointments are usually brief. Many procedures take under 30 minutes and use topical numbing agents to reduce discomfort. You may feel some pressure or a pinch during treatment. Mild swelling or bruising can occur, and many people return to usual activities soon after, as advised by their practitioner.
PDO thread procedures typically take around 45 to 60 minutes and require local anaesthetic in the treated area. People often describe a pulling or tightening sensation as threads are placed. Bruising, tenderness and visible swelling are more common in the first few days, with many side effects settling over about a week.
How Long Do Results Last?
Volume-based treatments often show early changes. Depending on the area, the product used and your metabolism, effects may be noticed for several months and, for some people, up to around 6 to 24 months.
Threads usually take longer to show their full effect. While some lift may be visible soon after the procedure, many people notice more change at around the 2 to 3 month mark as the body’s collagen response develops. These effects can sometimes be seen for up to about two years, although duration varies between individuals, and no specific result can be guaranteed.
Different Types of Threads
Not all thread treatments work in the same way. In Hobart, you will typically find two main types.
Mono threads are smooth and used more for collagen stimulation than lift. They are often chosen to improve skin texture in areas such as the jawline, neck, or around the mouth, especially where crepey or thinning skin is a concern.
Barbed threads have small hooks that physically lift the skin. They are used when sagging is more pronounced and the goal is structural repositioning, commonly in the cheeks, jowls or brow.
Your provider may suggest one or both types, depending on what your skin needs and how it responds over time.
Safety, Suitability and Side Effects
All medical treatments carry risk, and both facial contouring and PDO threading are only considered when planned by suitably qualified professionals. At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, every client begins with a medical and aesthetic consultation so that any suggested approach is explained and assessed in the context of overall health and goals.
Volume-based treatments can lead to swelling, tenderness or bruising. Rarely, more serious effects such as vascular occlusion can occur, which is why anatomical knowledge and careful, sterile technique are important.
With PDO threads, some people notice puckering, dimpling or tightness as the skin adjusts. These changes often settle as the threads integrate. In some cases, the threads may be felt under the skin or require adjustment. Your practitioner will discuss potential risks, expected limits and follow-up before any decision is made about treatment.

Why We Don’t Offer PDO Threads
At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, our focus is on safe, thoughtful and clinically justified care. While we offer treatments such as facial contouring, muscle relaxation therapy and skin regeneration, we currently do not perform thread lifts.
We continue to review new research and guidance and may consider PDO threads in the future if they align with our standards for safety, predictability, and ethical practice. In the meantime, we provide balanced information for people considering threads and discuss other options where appropriate.
Alternatives to Threads for Skin Laxity
If you are not suited to a thread lift or prefer not to pursue one, there are still options to support skin tone and texture.
Regenerative skin therapies, such as clinical skin needling, support collagen in a gradual, non-surgical way. For some clients, carefully planned volume placement may soften the look of the lower face by restoring structural support. Muscle relaxation therapy may help soften dynamic lines that make sagging more noticeable in the mid-to-lower face.
These approaches can be used alone or together as part of an individual plan to support skin firmness and facial balance, while aiming for natural-looking changes and practical downtime.

Every Face Needs a Different Approach
Skin doesn’t age the same way for everyone. Bone structure, fat distribution, muscle activity, and lifestyle all play a role. That’s why cosmetic care should never be one-size-fits-all.
At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, we start with a comprehensive face assessment and consultation. You’ll receive honest advice, clinical reasoning, and a treatment plan that reflects your real goals, not just what’s trending.
Sometimes, that means doing less. Other times, it means focusing on structurally important areas rather than what’s most visible. Either way, we plan carefully and work with you, not just on you.

Frequently Asked Questions About Facial Contouring and PDO Threads Hobart
Will I look unnatural after facial contouring or a thread lift?
These treatments are planned to support facial balance rather than change your features, and when they are carried out with anatomical planning and restraint, they aim to keep expression in line with your existing appearance, although results vary between individuals.
Can I have these treatments if I have allergies or sensitive skin?
They may still be an option, but you will need a full consultation. Your nurse will review your health history and skin sensitivity and recommend an approach that appears safe for you.
When can I wear makeup after my treatment?
Light makeup can be reapplied around 24 hours after facial contouring if your skin is comfortable and your practitioner agrees. After PDO threading, makeup is usually delayed for two or three days to reduce the chance of irritation while the skin settles.
Should I stop taking certain medications before my appointment?
Some supplements and medicines, such as fish oil, aspirin or anti-inflammatory drugs, can increase bruising. Your cosmetic nurse may ask you to speak with your GP before changing or pausing any regular medicines.
Is there a right age to start contouring or thread-based treatments?
There is no fixed age. Suitability depends more on facial volume, skin elasticity and personal goals than age itself.
Can I exercise after the treatment?
Avoid strenuous activity, heat and pressure on the face for at least 48 hours after contouring and up to a week after threading, as guided by your practitioner. This helps reduce swelling and support comfortable healing.

Hobart-Based Cosmetic Therapies with a Clinical Approach
Every face tells a different story, and the right treatment depends on more than just trends. Whether you’re considering volume, lift, or both, the best results come from understanding how your skin moves, where support is needed, and what feels right for you over time.
At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, we offer personalised care grounded in clinical knowledge, not sales pressure. You’ll receive clear, practical advice about what’s suitable, what’s not, and why. If facial contouring is right for you, we’ll map it carefully. If threads aren’t the answer, we’ll explore what is.
You won’t be rushed or upsold. Just real planning, based on your features and your pace.
If you’re ready to explore your options in a way that feels considered, calm, and grounded, book a consultation today. We’re here when you’re ready.
References
Heart Aesthetics Hobart always ensures the use of credible, up-to-date references for all our content related to cosmetic treatments in Hobart. We rely on peer-reviewed studies and trusted medical sources to provide accurate information to our local community in Hobart, Tasmania.
Ali YH. (2018). Two years’ outcome of thread lifting with absorbable barbed PDO threads: Innovative score for objective and subjective assessment. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 20(1):41-49. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2017.1368562. PMID: 28863268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2017.1368562
Aliyeva A. (2025). Synergistic facial rejuvenation with PDO threads and Botulinum Toxin A for aging skin. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg, 12(1):2546528. doi: 10.1080/23320885.2025.2546528. PMID: 40800026; PMCID: PMC12340935.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23320885.2025.2546528
Ao YJ, Yi Y, Wu GH. (2024). Application of PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic acid) for rejuvenation and reproduction of facial cutaneous tissue in aesthetics: A review. Medicine (Baltimore), 103(11):e37506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037506. PMID: 38489708; PMCID: PMC10939544.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037506
Arora G, Arora S. (2022). Periorbital Rejuvenation: A Study on the Use of Dermal Threads as Monotherapy, with a Review of Literature. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 15(1):48-57. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_221_20. PMID: 35655650; PMCID: PMC9153308.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_221_20
Bravo BSF, Bravo LG, Gouvea BF, Neves MRB, Nobre CS, Silva CDS, do Nascimento CMOL. (2025). Calcium Hydroxylapatite-Based Fillers in Facial Rejuvenation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Unblinded Comparative Outcome Study of Radiesse® vs. Rennova® Diamond Intense. J Clin Med, 14(12):4072. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124072. PMID: 40565818; PMCID: PMC12193805.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124072
Chakhachiro A, Waseem M. (2025). Risk Factor Analysis for Vascular Occlusions After Dermal Filler Injections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 17(4):e82800. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82800. PMID: 40406769; PMCID: PMC12097758.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82800
Cobo R. (2020). Use of Polydioxanone Threads as an Alternative in Nonsurgical Procedures in Facial Rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg, 36(4):447-452. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714266. PMID: 32866981.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714266
Diaspro A, Luni M, Rossini G. (2021). Thread Lifting of the Jawline: A Pilot Study for Quantitative Evaluation. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 14(1):47-54. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_41_20. PMID: 34084008; PMCID: PMC8149973.
https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_41_20
Germani M, Munoz-Lora VRM, Carnevali ACN, Geroldo AM, Teixeira FF, Giro G. (2025). Is More Always Better? A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial About the Impact of Polydioxanone Threads Quantity for Facial Lifting. Aesthetic Surg J Open Forum, 7:ojaf002. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf002.
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf002
Goel A, Rai K. (2022). Non-surgical facelift by PDO threads and dermal filler: A case report. J Cosmet Dermatol, 21(10):4241-4244. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14921. PMID: 35298863.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14921
Hoffman L, Fabi S. (2022). Look Better, Feel Better, Live Better? The Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on Satisfaction with Appearance and Psychosocial Wellbeing. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 15(5):47-58. PMID: 35642226; PMCID: PMC9122280.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122280/
Hong GW, Hu H, Chang K, Park Y, Lee KWA, Chan LKW, Yi KH. (2024). Review of the Adverse Effects Associated with Dermal Filler Treatments: Part I Nodules, Granuloma, and Migration. Diagnostics (Basel), 14(15):1640. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151640. PMID: 39125515; PMCID: PMC11311355.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151640
Hong GW, Kim SB, Park SY, Wan J, Yi KH. (2024). Thread Lifting Materials: A Review of Its Difference in Terms of Technical and Mechanical Perspective. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 17:999-1006. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S457352. PMID: 38737945; PMCID: PMC11086642.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S457352
Kestemont P, Fanian F, Garcia P, et al. (2023). Long-term efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid dermal filler based on Tri-Hyal technology on restoration of midface volume. J Cosmet Dermatol, 22(9):2448-2456. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15752. PMID: 37128822.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15752
Kim JH, Han MW, Lee MH, Kweon DK, Park YJ, Heo CY. (2024). Comparative In Vivo Study of Solid-Type Pure Hyaluronic Acid in Thread Form: Safety and Efficacy Compared to Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Polydioxanone Threads. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 48(2):221-227. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03614-6. PMID: 37644191; PMCID: PMC10912330.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03614-6
Master M, Azizeddin A, Master V. (2024). Hyaluronic Acid Filler Longevity in the Mid-face: A Review of 33 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 12(7):e5934. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005934. PMID: 39015357; PMCID: PMC11250456.
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005934
Mehta-Ambalal SR. (2016). Neocollagenesis and Neoelastinogenesis: From the Laboratory to the Clinic. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 9(3):145-151. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.191645. PMID: 27761083; PMCID: PMC5064677.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.191645
Middleton EO, Karypidis D. (2023). Validation of Non-surgical Facial Lifting with PDO Thread using a 3D system. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg, 10:100411. doi: 10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100411
Murray G, Convery C, Walker L, Davies E. (2021). Guideline for the Management of Hyaluronic Acid Filler-induced Vascular Occlusion. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 14(5):E61-E69. PMID: 34188752; PMCID: PMC8211329.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211329/
Suh DH, Jang HW, Lee SJ, Lee WS, Ryu HJ. (2015). Outcomes of polydioxanone knotless thread lifting for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg, 41(6):720-725. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000368. PMID: 25993611.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000368
Wan J, Park HJ, Choi HS, Yi KH. (2025). A Pilot One and Two-Year Prospective, Blinded Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Combined Treatment With Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler and Barbed Polydioxanone Suspension Threads for Mid-Face Contour Enhancement. J Cosmet Dermatol, 24(2):e16700. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16700. PMID: 39692727; PMCID: PMC11845956.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16700
Wang CK. (2020). Complications of thread lift about skin dimpling and thread extrusion. Dermatol Ther, 33(4):e13446. doi: 10.1111/dth.13446. PMID: 32323425; PMCID: PMC7507174.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13446
Weng YC, Hsieh CH, Liang BC. (2025). A Retrospective Observational Study of Combination Treatment of Thread Lift and High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Facial Aging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 13(6):e6899. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006899. PMID: 40520495; PMCID: PMC12165659.
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006899
Yi KH, Park SY. (2025). Facial Thread Lifting Complications. J Cosmet Dermatol. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16745.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16745
Last reviewed: November 2025
Next scheduled update: August 2026


