Clients in Hobart often want smoother, clearer skin without extended downtime or unnecessary irritation. Both Tixel and laser treatments target skin texture, lines, and pigmentation, but they do so in very different ways. Understanding those differences is essential before deciding what’s right for your skin.
Tixel is popular among clients who want to improve their skin texture, reduce fine lines, and enhance tone without the use of radiation or light-based devices. It uses heat transferred directly through a metal tip, applied momentarily to the skin’s surface. Laser treatments, by contrast, use pulses of concentrated light to target skin cells. Depending on the type of laser, they may treat pigmentation, broken vessels, or deeper wrinkles.
At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, many clients ask which treatment is better: Tixel or laser. There isn’t one right answer. Your skin type, tolerance for downtime, treatment goals, and previous experiences all help determine the best fit.
Quick Answers About Tixel vs Laser in Hobart
What’s the main difference between Tixel and laser skin treatments?
Tixel uses direct heat transferred through a metal tip, while laser treatments use concentrated light energy. Tixel works without light or radiation, making it safer for individuals with sensitive or pigmented skin types. Laser can treat deeper wrinkles or pigmentation, but it often comes with longer downtime.
Is Tixel better than laser for sensitive skin?
Yes. Tixel is generally better tolerated by sensitive or redness-prone skin because it doesn’t use light or trigger inflammation from radiation. It is often the preferred choice for clients in Hobart with rosacea, dry skin, or those prone to post-inflammatory pigmentation.
Can I get Tixel in summer, or should I wait?
Tixel can be done year-round, including in summer. It doesn’t increase photosensitivity like many lasers do, making it a safer choice in Hobart’s high-UV climate. You’ll still need to protect your skin with SPF, but there’s no enforced seasonal limit.
How Tixel Works Compared to Laser Treatments
Tixel uses pure heat, not light. A titanium plate heats to a set temperature and briefly comes into contact with the skin to create tiny, controlled zones of thermal effect. These zones stimulate collagen production while preserving the surrounding skin. The depth and intensity can be adjusted based on your goals and tolerance.
Laser treatments vary widely depending on the type of machine and wavelength used. Some are non-ablative and work in the lower layers of skin without removing the surface. Others are ablative, vaporising the top layer of skin to trigger a more dramatic repair response. Laser therapy relies on how the skin reacts to light absorption, whether in water, pigment, or blood vessels.
Tixel is generally considered more predictable on sensitive skin, especially in Hobart’s drier and windier climate. Laser can be more intense but suitable for thicker skin or advanced ageing.
Treatment Recovery Time and Disruption
Tixel treatment is low-disruption. Clients typically experience mild redness and a faint grid pattern where the tip of the device touched the skin. This lasts around 48 hours, sometimes longer on thinner skin. Makeup and active skincare are avoided during this healing window. Flaking may occur by day three, but many clients return to work or light activities within one to two days.
Laser recovery is more variable. Non-ablative treatments have minimal downtime, whereas ablative lasers can cause redness, peeling, and swelling that may last over a week. Some lasers also increase light sensitivity for several weeks. If you have an event or work commitment, Tixel usually fits better into tighter timelines.
Skin Types and Safety Considerations
Clients with sensitive or redness-prone skin often find Tixel easier to tolerate. Because it doesn’t use light, it avoids triggering flare-ups in rosacea or reactive skin. The treatment is also safer for medium skin tones and those prone to pigmentation changes.
Laser can be more difficult to use safely on darker skin tones or those with a history of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The type of laser matters. Some wavelengths are safer than others, but care must always be taken to avoid causing new pigment changes.
For those who want to treat crepey skin under the eyes, around the mouth, or on the neck, Tixel is often preferred due to its ability to treat delicate skin without causing burns or blisters.
Skin Concerns Addressed by Each Treatment
Tixel improves skin quality gradually, making it suitable for early to moderate signs of ageing. It smooths texture, refines pores, and softens lines over a series of sessions. Tixel also works well for tired, dull skin that needs a refresh but not a major change. It can be used safely around the eyes and on the eyelids.
Laser may be the better choice if you are targeting deep scarring, pigmentation clusters, or pronounced wrinkles. Ablative lasers, in particular, reach deeper layers of the dermis and can deliver more dramatic results, but with a longer recovery time.
In Hobart, where UV levels are high and indoor heating is often dry, many clients find that laser treatments are best reserved for cooler months, while Tixel can be used year-round.
Comfort During Treatment
Tixel typically doesn’t require numbing. Most clients describe it as a brief warmth or stinging that fades quickly. Settings can be tailored for comfort. This is helpful for clients who are new to skin treatments or want to avoid anaesthetics.
Laser often requires the use of numbing cream, especially for ablative options. Some clients also need cooling air during treatment or experience post-treatment soreness. The sensation depends on the type of laser and its depth of penetration.
Treatment Frequency and Results Timeline
Tixel is usually performed as a series of treatments, spaced four to six weeks apart. Results build gradually. Most clients begin to notice improved skin quality after the second or third treatment, with maximum benefits appearing after six sessions. Maintenance treatments, administered every six to twelve months, can help extend the benefits.
Laser treatments may also be offered in a series, but ablative laser treatments are often done as a one-off treatment, followed by a longer recovery period. Results are more immediate but come with more intense downtime.
Pairing Tixel and Laser in a Treatment Plan
Some clients benefit from a treatment plan that includes both options. For example, Tixel can be used first to improve skin quality and hydration, making the skin more resilient. Once the skin is healthier and more evenly toned, a specific laser treatment can be used to target deeper pigmentation or blood vessels.
Because both treatments work on different principles, they can complement each other when used in conjunction. However, combining them in a single session is not recommended. Your treatment plan should reflect your skin’s ability to recover and respond.
Frequently Asked Questions About Tixel vs Laser in Hobart
Does Tixel or laser work better for under-eye lines?
Tixel is usually safer and more effective for under-eye and eyelid areas. It treats crepey skin gently without causing swelling or burns. Laser is often too aggressive for these delicate zones unless used at very low settings.
How do I know if I need a laser instead of Tixel?
If you have deep acne scars, widespread pigmentation, or pronounced wrinkles, a laser may be recommended. However, if you’re seeking gradual improvement with minimal downtime, Tixel is a more suitable option. Your nurse will assess your skin before making a decision.
Can I wear makeup after a Tixel or laser session?
After Tixel, most clients wait 24 to 48 hours before applying makeup. After laser, especially ablative types, you may need to avoid makeup for a week or longer, depending on the level of redness and skin flaking.
What hurts more: laser or Tixel?
Laser treatments, especially ablative ones, are typically more painful and often require the use of numbing cream. Tixel is described as a warm, brief sensation and usually doesn’t require anaesthetic.
How many sessions will I need with Tixel vs laser?
Tixel is often performed as a series of four to six sessions to achieve cumulative results. Laser may be performed as a single treatment or a short series, depending on the condition being treated.
Can I combine Tixel and laser in the same appointment?
No. Tixel and laser use different energies and healing responses. They can both be part of a treatment plan, but should be spaced out to avoid over-stressing the skin. Your nurse will guide the safest timing.
When to Choose Tixel Over Laser in Hobart’s Climate
Hobart’s skin challenges aren’t always seasonal; they’re constant, just shifting. High UV exposure, wind, and dry indoor heat all contribute to how skin looks, feels, and recovers. That’s why the right treatment isn’t just about what you’re targeting, but when and how your skin can handle it.
Clients with tight schedules or sensitive skin often find Tixel easier to manage. It offers gradual, visible change without major disruption. Laser may be suitable for those who want a stronger correction and are comfortable with the downtime. Neither is bette,r they’re just different tools, used at the right time for the right reason.
At Heart Aesthetics Hobart, each treatment plan is tailored to your skin’s unique behaviour, not trends or rigid protocols. If you’re unsure which direction to take, we’ll help you make a decision. Book a consultation when you’re ready to start something measured, not rushed.
References
Heart Aesthetics Hobart always ensures the use of credible, up-to-date references for all our content related to cosmetic treatments in Hobart. We rely on peer-reviewed studies and trusted medical sources to provide accurate information to our local community in Hobart, Tasmania.
Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. (2008). The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol, 58(5):719-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.003. PMID: 18423256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.003
Artzi O, Mehrabi JN, Heyman L, Friedman O, Mashiah J. (2019). Treatment of port wine stain with Tixel-induced rapamycin delivery following pulsed dye laser application. Dermatol Ther. doi: 10.1111/dth.13172.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13172
Bar-Ilan E, Koren A, Shehadeh W, Mashiah J, Sprecher E, Artzi O. (2019). An enhanced transcutaneous delivery of botulinum toxin for the treatment of Hailey–Hailey disease. Dermatol Ther. doi: 10.1111/dth.13184.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.13184
Daniely D, Judodihardjo H, Rajpar SF, Mehrabi J, Artzi O. (2021). Thermo-Mechanical Fractional Injury Therapy for Facial Skin Rejuvenation in Skin Types II to V: A Retrospective Double-Center Chart Review. Lasers Surg Med. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23400.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23400
Elman M, Fournier N, Barnéon G, Bernstein EF, Lask G. (2016). Fractional treatment of aging skin with Tixel, a clinical and histological evaluation. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 18(1):31-7. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2015.1052513. PMID: 26073117.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2015.1052513
Estupiñan B, Souchik A, Kiszluk A, Desai S. (2024). Comprehensive Review of Thermomechanical Fractional Injury Device: Applications in Medical and Cosmetic Dermatology. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 17(2):32-42. PMID: 38444425; PMCID: PMC10911265.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38444425/
Foged C, Haedersdal M, Bik L, Dierickx C, Phillipsen PA, Togsverd-Bo K. (2020). Thermo-Mechanical Fractional Injury Enhances Skin Surface- and Epidermis- Protoporphyrin IX Fluorescence: Comparison of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in Cream and Gel Vehicles. Lasers Surg Med. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23326.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23326
Friedman O, Koren A, Niv R, Mehrabi JN, Artzi O. (2018). The toxic edge—A novel treatment for refractory erythema and flushing of rosacea. Lasers Surg Med. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23023.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23023
Glaser DA, Kurta A. (2016). Periorbital Rejuvenation: Overview of Nonsurgical Treatment Options. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 24(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.01.003. PMID: 27105800.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.01.003
Hilerowicz Y, Friedman O, Zur E, Ziv R, Koren A, Salameh F, Mehrabi JN, Artzi O. (2020). Thermomechanical Ablation-Assisted Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Retrospective Chart Review of 30 Patients. Lasers Surg Med. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23246.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23246
Judodihardjo H, Rajpar SF. (2021). Retrospective study on the safety and tolerability of clinical treatments with a novel Thermomechanical Ablation device on 150 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14243.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14243
Jung JY, Cho SB, Chung HJ, Shin JU, Lee KH, Chung KY. (2010). Treatment of periorbital wrinkles with 1550- and 1565-nm Er:glass fractional photothermolysis lasers: a simultaneous split-face trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03870.x.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03870.x
Lask G, Elman M, Fournier N, Slatkine M. (2012). Fractional vaporization of tissue with an oscillatory array of high temperature rods – Part I: Ex vivo study. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 14(5):218–223. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2012.698284.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2012.698284
Love LP, Farrior EH. (2010). Periocular Anatomy and Aging. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 18(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2010.05.001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2010.05.001
Manuskiatti W, Yan C, Artzi O, Gervasio MKR, Wanitphakdeedecha R. (2021). Efficacy and safety of thermomechanical fractional injury-assisted corticosteroid delivery versus intralesional corticosteroid injection for the treatment of hypertrophic scars: A randomized split-scar trial. Lasers Surg Med. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23511.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23511
Oren-Shabtai M, Sloutsky N, Lapidoth M, Mimouni D, Chorny I, Snast I, Leshem Y, Friedland R, Hodak E, Klein I, Agmon Y, Levi A. (2022). Efficacy and safety of a thermal fractional skin rejuvenation system (Tixel) for the treatment of facial and/or scalp actinic keratoses. Lasers Med Sci, 37(7):2899-2905. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03558-4. PMID: 35412157.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03558-4
Preissig J, Hamilton K, Markus R. (2012). Current Laser Resurfacing Technologies: A Review that Delves Beneath the Surface. Semin Plast Surg, 26(3):109-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329413. PMID: 23904818; PMCID: PMC3580982.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329413
Salameh F, Kauvar A, Carasso R, Mehrabi J, Artzi O. (2021). Treatment of periorbital wrinkles using thermo-mechanical fractional injury therapy versus fractional non-ablative 1565 nm laser: A comparative prospective, randomized, double-arm, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med, 54. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23494.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23494
Shah S, Dutta D, Barua A, Hanneken L, Naroo SA. (2023). The effect of non-ablative thermomechanical skin treatment (Tixel®) on dry eye disease: A prospective two centre open-label trial. Contact Lens Anterior Eye, 46(2):101811. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101811. PMID: 36581291.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101811
Shavit R, Dierickx C. (2020). A New Method for Percutaneous Drug Delivery by Thermo-Mechanical Fractional Injury. Lasers Surg Med, 52(1):61-69. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23125. PMID: 31254291.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23125
Sintov AC, Hofmann MA. (2016). A novel thermo-mechanical system enhanced transdermal delivery of hydrophilic active agents by fractional ablation. Int J Pharm, 511(2):821-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.070
Sukal SA, Chapas AM, Bernstein LJ, Hale EK, Kim KH, Geronemus RG. (2008). Eyelid Tightening and Improved Eyelid Aperture through Nonablative Fractional Resurfacing. Dermatol Surg, 34(11):1454-1458. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34428.x. PMID: 19076198.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34428.x
Wang JV, Bajaj S, Steuer A, Orbuch D, Geronemus RG. (2023). Prospective Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Thermomechanical Fractional Injury for Perioral Rhytides. Dermatol Surg, 49(6):566-569. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003762. PMID: 36946689.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000003762
Wang JV, Jairath N, Tao J, Hashemi DA, Bajaj S, Geronemus RG. (2025). Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Thermomechanical Fractional Injury Device for Neck Rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg, 51(2):175-178. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004402.
https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004402
Weniger FG, Weidman AA, Castedo CEB. (2020). Full-Field Erbium:YAG Laser Resurfacing: Complications and Suggested Safety Parameters. Aesthetic Surg J, 40(6):NP374–NP385. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz319.
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz319
Last reviewed: August 2025
Next scheduled update: August 2026
